Skip to main content
· 1/24/1992

Illinois Legislative Redistricting Commission v. LaPaille

Citations

  • 782 F. Supp. 1272
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 818

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the plaintiff did not “present arguments or evidence showing that age was the but-for cause for the adverse employment action taken against him”
  • plaintiff's AADEA claims were duplicative of claims under the ADEA and due to be dismissed on summary judgment
  • plaintiff's AADEA claims were duplicative of claims under the ADEA and due to be dismissed on summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Norgle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.