· 1/24/1992
Illinois Legislative Redistricting Commission v. LaPaille
Citations
- 782 F. Supp. 1272
- 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 818
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the plaintiff did not “present arguments or evidence showing that age was the but-for cause for the adverse employment action taken against him”
- plaintiff's AADEA claims were duplicative of claims under the ADEA and due to be dismissed on summary judgment
- plaintiff's AADEA claims were duplicative of claims under the ADEA and due to be dismissed on summary judgment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Norgle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.