Skip to main content
· 11/6/1991

Hastert v. State Board of Elections

Citations

  • 777 F. Supp. 634
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16446
  • 1991 WL 228185

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that first Gingles factor provides “an objective brightline measure for determining whether an injury has in fact occurred”
  • noting that a \65% minority population [or 60% minority voting-age population] concentration [is] generally regarded as necessary to ensure minorities a reasonable opportunity to control a district\
  • noting that a \65% minority population [or 60% minority voting-age population] concentration [is] generally regarded as necessary to ensure minorities a reasonable opportunity to control a district\
  • noting that a \65% minority population [or 60% minority voting-age population] concentration [is] generally regarded as necessary to ensure minorities a reasonable opportunity to control a district\
  • noting that a \65% minority population [or 60% minority voting-age population] concentration [is] generally regarded as necessary to ensure minorities a reasonable opportunity to control a district\
  • noting that a \65% minority population [or 60% minority voting- 38 No. 2021AP1450-OA.rgb age population] concentration [is] generally regarded as necessary to ensure minorities a reasonable opportunity to control a district\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kanne, Norgle, Conlon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.