Seventh Circuit· 8/7/1991
Perkins v. Silverstein
Citations
- 939 F.2d 463
- 20 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 493
- 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 17942
- 57 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,910
- 56 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1093
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- plaintiff's right to amend as a mat- ter of course is not absolute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Montes v. Vail Clinic, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2007-08-14· cited 154×
- Worth, Lisa v. Tyer, Robert H.Seventh Circuit· 2001-12-27· cited 109×
- Allen v. City of ChicagoN.D. Illinois· 1993-07-02· cited 65×
- United States v. International Longshoremen's Ass'nE.D. New York· 2007-11-01· cited 48×
- Illinois Ex Rel. Ryan v. Volpert (In Re Volpert)N.D. Illinois· 1994-11-23· cited 32×
- Brant v. Gerardo (In Re Gerardo Leasing, Inc.)N.D. Illinois· 1994-10-03· cited 31×
- Industrial Hard Chrome. Ltd. v. Hetran, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1999-09-02· cited 28×
- Thrift v. Estate of HubbardFifth Circuit· 1995-02-15· cited 27×
- Boykin v. FentyDistrict of Columbia· 2012-10-04· cited 25×
- DeJohn v. The. TV Corp. Intern.C.D. Illinois· 2003-01-16· cited 24×
- Smith v. Pizza Hut, Inc.D. Colorado· 2010-03-11· cited 21×
- Dichter-Mad Family Partners, LLP v. United StatesC.D. California· 2010-04-20· cited 16×
- Dames & Moore v. Baxter & Woodman, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1998-08-06· cited 16×
- Kathryn Ann Heimer v. Mason William HeimerWyoming Supreme Court· 2021-08-30· cited 15×
- Chapman v. Burton Berger & Associates (In Re Chapman)N.D. Illinois· 1993-04-04· cited 13×
- F. McConnell & Sons, Inc. v. Target Data Systems, Inc.N.D. Indiana· 1999-02-02· cited 12×
- MAN Roland Inc. v. Quantum Color Corp.N.D. Illinois· 1999-06-18· cited 11×
- Peaceable Planet, Inc. v. Ty, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2002-01-18· cited 11×
- Stansberry v. Uhlich Children's HomeN.D. Illinois· 2003-05-21· cited 10×
- Rezin v. Barr (In Re Barr)N.D. Illinois· 1995-06-27· cited 8×
Cites
50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court· 1978-06-06· cited 41,449×
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court· 1962-12-03· cited 17,205×
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 14,284×
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court· 1974-04-17· cited 13,385×
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court· 1985-06-28· cited 11,385×
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court· 1984-05-22· cited 5,292×
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court· 1985-08-14· cited 3,810×
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court· 1976-06-10· cited 2,973×
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-02-24· cited 2,939×
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 1,972×
- Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1984-10-30· cited 1,241×
- Great American Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. NovotnySupreme Court· 1979-06-11· cited 1,006×
- Craig S. Strauss v. City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation, and Chicago Police Officer John DoeSeventh Circuit· 1985-04-17· cited 445×
- Jorge Gomez v. Illinois State Board of Education and Ted Sanders, in His Official Capacity as Illinois State Superintendent of EducationSeventh Circuit· 1987-01-30· cited 335×
- Steve Rodgers v. Lincoln Towing Service, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1985-08-15· cited 266×
- Perkins v. SilversteinSeventh Circuit· 1991-08-07· cited 233×
- Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court· 1985-03-18· cited 231×
- Schnellbaecher v. Baskin Clothing Co.Seventh Circuit· 1989-10-05· cited 173×
- Thomason v. NachtriebSeventh Circuit· 1989-11-06· cited 173×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.