Skip to main content
· 3/11/1992

Commission v. Lapaille

Citations

  • 786 F. Supp. 704
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2930
  • 1992 WL 45737

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a letter primarily concerned with an employee’s personal situation could not be deemed an issue of public concern
  • dismissing a count plaintiff failed to address in his opposition to the motion to dismiss
  • declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims where “the litigation has not proceeded to a stage where litigating the matter in state court would cause undue delay or duplicative effort” (quotations and citation omitted)
  • finding claim waived where Plaintiff’s opposition failed to respond to Defendant’s argument
  • a claim was waived where plaintiff failed to address it in his opposition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kanne, Norgle, Zagel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.