Skip to main content
· 3/27/1985

Carl Sandburg Village Condominium Association No. 1, Plaintiffs v. First Condominium Development Co.

Citations

  • 758 F.2d 203
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 29879

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A complaint must state either 7 direct or inferential allegations concerning all of the material elements necessary for recovery under the relevant legal theory.”
  • “A complaint must state either direct or inferential allegations concerning all of the material elements necessary for recovery under the relevant legal theory.”
  • “A complaint must state either direct or inferential allegations concerning all of the material elements necessary for recovery under the relevant legal theory.”
  • “[PJlaintiff does not establish the requisite economic interest in the tied product market merely by alleging that the tying seller is receiving a profit from the transaction as a whole.”
  • “[P]laintiff does not establish the requisite economic interest 29 in the tied product market merely by alleging that the tying seller is receiving a profit from the transaction as a whole.”
  • a plaintiff must show, under both the per se and rule of reason analyses, that there is a “substantial danger” that the seller will acquire market power in the tied product market

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Pell, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.