Iliev v. Holder, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the appellant’s failure to sufficiently develop an argument in his opening brief constituted a waiver
• stating that the appellant’s failure to sufficiently develop an argument in his opening brief constituted a waiver
• “We do not resort to legislative history to cloud a statutory text that is clear.” (quotation cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).