Wei Guang Wang v. Board of Immigration Appeals

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 5 changed personal circumstances do not fall within the changed 6 country conditions exception to reopening
• holding that changed personal circumstances 18 do not fall within the changed conditions exception to 19 reopening
• holding that a petitioner cannot “seek[] to reopen . . . due to circumstances entirely of his own making after being ordered to leave the United States”
• holding that the agency need not “expressly parse or refute on the record each individual argument or piece of evidence offered by the petitioner.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• holding that the BIA is not required to “expressly parse or refute on the record each individual argument or piece of evidence offered by the petitioner” as long as it “has given reasoned consideration to the petition, and made adequate findings”
• holding that the BIA is not required to “expressly parse or refute on the record each individual argument or piece of evidence offered by the petitioner” as long as it “has given reasoned consideration to the petition, and made adequate findings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).