John Tsibo Fynn v. U.S. Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Argument that the IJ or BIA abused its discretion by improperly weighing evidence is . . . insufficient to state a legal or constitutional claim.”
• challenges to the “the agency’s credibility determination and the relative weight accorded to the evidence” are not legal questions under § 1252(a)(2)(D)
• “Argument that the IJ or BIA abused its discretion by improperly weighing evidence is a ‘garden-variety abuse of discretion argument’ that is insufficient to state a legal or constitutional claim.” (quotation omitted)
• “Argument that the IJ or BIA abused its discretion by improperly weighing evidence is a ‘garden-variety abuse of discretion argument’ that is insufficient to state a legal or constitutional claim.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).