Hutchins v. Schwartz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by naming defendant the prevailing party where plaintiff recovered $1,937.09 less forty percent on a claim for $275,000
• holding superior court did not abuse its discretion by determining defendant was prevailing party when plaintiff who sought $275,000 recovered less than $1,937.09
• affirming a jury award of $250 for lost earnings rather than the $18,500 the plaintiff claimed; $0 instead of $75,000 for lost enjoyment of life and physical impairment; and $937 for past medical expenses instead of the claimed $20,794

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).