LaHue v. General Motors Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• admitting evidence of seatbelt non-use on the issue of causation, despite state statute barring such evidence to show comparative negligence
• admitting evidence of seatbelt non-use on the issue of causation, despite state statute bar- ring such evidence to show comparative negligence
• \The design of individual components within this car need not be considered in a vacuum because safety features such as seat belts are a part of the overall design.\
• “The design of individual components within this car need not be considered in a vacuum because safety features such as seat belts are a part of the overall design.”
• \The design of individual components within this car need not be considered in a vacuum because safety features such as seat belts are a part of the overall design.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).