Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 5/8/1990
Hunter v. State
Citations
- 573 A.2d 85
- 82 Md. App. 679
- 1990 Md. App. LEXIS 78
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that a search for legal counsel was irrelevant 21 to consciousness of guilt because a person seeking legal counsel “may just as well believe himself entirely innocent or only partly culpable, or he simply may not know whether his acts or omissions are in violation of the law”
- comment that defendant, accused drunk driver, had telephoned his attorney, along with emergency assistance, for accident that he had caused, violated fourteenth amendment
- court erred when it allowed trooper to testify that defendant had immediately crossed street after causing fatal accident and called his attorney
- “the rule seems well-established that it is impermissible for the State to offer evidence of, or comment upon, a criminal defendant’s obtention of counsel or his attempt, request, or desire to obtain counsel in order to show a consciousness of guilt”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilner, Wxlner, Alpert, Getty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. ColavitaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-04-29· cited 319×
- Rubin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-03-06· cited 102×
- State v. ANGEL T.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-06-30· cited 67×
- State v. DixonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2005-06-03· cited 63×
- Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-07-09· cited 44×
- Riddley v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2000-06-29· cited 33×
- Henderson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-10-21· cited 27×
- State v. PurveyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-11-01· cited 25×
- Kulbicki v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-09-26· cited 16×
- Waddell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-11-28· cited 12×
- Drake v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-07-07· cited 11×
- Casey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-01-04· cited 8×
- Drake and Charles v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-07-07· cited 8×
- Lupfer v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-09-03· cited 3×
- Aundra Lavell Riddley v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 1997-02-12
- Akers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2025-02-19
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 4,773×
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-04-28· cited 4,680×
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,088×
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 3,950×
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court· 1986-03-10· cited 3,339×
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-06-07· cited 3,001×
- Maine v. MoultonSupreme Court· 1985-12-10· cited 1,260×
- United States v. GouveiaSupreme Court· 1984-05-29· cited 1,098×
- State v. MacOnSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1971-01-25· cited 857×
- People v. GacyIllinois Supreme Court· 1984-06-06· cited 149×
- United States v. George Gordon Liddy, A/K/A George F. LeonardD.C. Circuit· 1974-11-08· cited 138×
- United States v. James Ray McDonaldFifth Circuit· 1980-07-03· cited 110×
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Isiah MacOn v. Howard Yeager, Principal Keeper of the New Jersey State PrisonThird Circuit· 1973-03-30· cited 107×
- Lodowski v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-08-22· cited 91×
- Kerr v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-06-13· cited 91×
- Jensen v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1984-09-11· cited 82×
- Harrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-10-07· cited 80×
- United States v. GoldN.D. Illinois· 1979-04-20· cited 73×
- Zemina v. SolemD. South Dakota· 1977-09-22· cited 65×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.