D. South Dakota· 9/22/1977

Zemina v. Solem

Citations

438 F. Supp. 455
1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13875

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

granting writ where state courts erred in determining that there was inadequate evidence to support instructions on justification and ailing instruction violated due process under Cupp
where prosecutor argued that '[t]he fact that [defendant] called his lawyer is a telling sign'
where exhausted issues closely related to unexhausted issues were not considered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nichol

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

69 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Zemina v. Solem

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.