Skip to main content

Casey v. State

Citations

  • 722 A.2d 385
  • 124 Md. App. 331
  • 1999 Md. App. LEXIS 3

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that event that occurs in course of investigation does not, ipso facto, establish its relevance
  • court erred when it admitted portions of tape recording of defendant’s statement in which he requested counsel and in which police expressed opinion that he was not being truthful
  • waiver is limited to the specific confidential conversation that client disclosed to third party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Bloxom, Alpert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.