Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 11/26/2002

Hung Thanh Le v. Mullin

Citations

  • 311 F.3d 1002
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 24183
  • 2002 WL 31662748

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defense counsel was not ineffective for failing to request a self-defense instruction, where the evidence did not permit such instruction under Oklahoma law
  • holding that defense counsel was not ineffective for failing to request a self-defense instruction, where the evidence did not permit such instruction under Oklahoma law
  • criticizing prosecutor for mischaracterizing evidence and suggesting that defendant had committed other murders when such facts were not in evidence
  • asking whether the jury was able “to judge the evidence fairly in light of the prosecutor’s conduct”
  • finding it improper to tell the jury they \could only do justice in this case by bringing in a verdict of death\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • finding it improper to tell the jury they “could only do justice in this case by 64 bringing in a verdict of death” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Briscoe, Ebel, Henry, Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Hung Thanh Le v. Mullin

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.