Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 3/30/2018

Grant v. Royal

Citations

  • 886 F.3d 874

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where the petitioner “makes no effort to overcome this bar by arguing cause and prejudice, or a fundamental miscarriage of justice . . . we are precluded from considering [his procedurally defaulted] . . . claim”
  • concluding petitioner had not preserved arguments for appellate review because he failed to raise them in his habeas petition
  • “We cumulate error only upon a showing of at least two actual errors.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holmes, Bacharach, Moritz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

187 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.