Tenth Circuit· 8/2/2004

Gipson v. Jordan

Citations

376 F.3d 1193
2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 15868
2004 WL 1719452

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[I]f the state court did not decide a claim on the merits, and the claim is not otherwise procedurally barred, we address the issue de novo and the § 2254(d)(1) deference requirement does not apply.”
“Conversely, if the state court did not decide a claim on the merits, and the claim is not otherwise procedurally barred, [federal courts] address the issue de novo and the § 2254(d)(1) deference requirement does not apply.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seymour, Lucero, Cassell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Gipson v. Jordan

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.