Skip to main content

Hughen v. State

Citations

  • 297 S.W.3d 330
  • 2009 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1431
  • 2009 WL 3189187

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that the Fifth Amendment bar on police-initiated interrogation is applicable only \in the context of custodial interrogation\
  • reasoning that the Fifth Amendment bar on police-initiated interrogation is applicable only A in the context of custodial interrogation @
  • reasoning that the Fifth Amendment bar on police-initiated interrogation is applicable only “in the context of custodial interrogation”
  • defendant’s “Article 15.17 initial appearance marked the initiation of adversarial judicial proceedings against him and thus ‘plainly signal[ed] attachment’ of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel.”
  • defendant's \Article 15.17 initial appearance marked the initiation of adversarial judicial proceedings against him and thus 'plainly signal[ed] attachment' of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel.\
  • “A trial court has plenary jurisdiction to reconsider its interlocutory rulings, like that at bar, and retains that ability until a final judgment or order is entered in the cause and the decree becomes final.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holcomb, Keller, Meyers, Hervey, Cochran, Womack, Keasler, Price, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Hughen v. State

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.