Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1/30/1991
Holland v. State
Citations
- 802 S.W.2d 696
- 1991 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 14
- 1991 WL 7992
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that violation of confrontation clause must be preserved by timely and specific objection at trial
- concluding that a hearsay objection does not preserve a claim of constitutional error because evidentiary and constitutional errors “are neither synonymous nor necessarily coextensive”
- holding that violation of confrontation clause must be preserved by timely and specific objection at trial
- holding that hearsay objection did not preserve error on confrontation or 16 due-process grounds
- reasoning that a defendant forfeits his constitutional right to confront witnesses if he does not object to the denial of that right at trial
- reasoning that a defendant forfeits his constitutional right to confront witnesses if he does not object to the denial of that right at trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clinton, Teague, Maloney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
145 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Beckham v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-11-20· cited 235×
- Miles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-02-28· cited 217×
- Monreal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-06-11· cited 206×
- Gregory v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2001-09-13· cited 185×
- Rhodes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-11-07· cited 163×
- Bingham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-12-21· cited 153×
- State v. CortezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2018-01-24· cited 125×
- Ex Parte CastellanoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-09-29· cited 124×
- Bunton v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2004-05-13· cited 111×
- Deener v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2007-02-14· cited 100×
- In re FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2014-04-30· cited 89×
- Bays, Michael JayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-04-17· cited 88×
- Thacker v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1999-07-15· cited 72×
- Saenz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-11-25· cited 70×
- Rosas v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2002-05-09· cited 65×
- Smith, Fredrichee DouglasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2015-06-24· cited 62×
- Phelps v. StateTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 1999-07-29· cited 60×
- Gerald P. VanPatten v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2013-05-02· cited 58×
- Acevedo v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2008-01-30· cited 58×
- Reckart v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2010-08-26· cited 58×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- California v. GreenSupreme Court· 1970-06-23· cited 3,363×
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,081×
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,040×
- United States v. InadiSupreme Court· 1986-03-10· cited 682×
- Briggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-05-16· cited 598×
- Zillender v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-11-09· cited 440×
- Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-07-01· cited 195×
- Rochelle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-05-16· cited 128×
- Tallant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-06-24· cited 77×
- Lee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-06-20· cited 74×
- Buckley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-03-21· cited 67×
- Ex Parte CrispenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-09-20· cited 64×
- Collins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-07-16· cited 58×
- Holland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1989-04-12· cited 58×
- Lambrecht v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-12-19· cited 46×
- Campos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1962-02-07· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.