Skip to main content

Barfield v. State

Citations

  • 63 S.W.3d 446
  • 2001 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 132
  • 2001 WL 1626916

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “court of appeals erred to limit its consideration of the evidence to that which was introduced at the ‘guilt’ stage of [a] non-jury trial”
  • holding that Article 37.07, Section 2 “is applicable only to pleas of not guilty before a jury” and “ha[s] no application to a trial before the court on a plea of not guilty”
  • stating that separate plea to enhancement paragraphs was unnecessary in felony DWI case because previous DWI convictions are elements of the felony DWI offense
  • stating that felony DWI offenses are tried in either the district courts or the criminal district courts
  • stating that separate plea to enhancement paragraphs was unnecessary in felony DWI case because previous DWI convictions are elements of the felony DWI offense
  • explaining that Article 37.07's bifurcated-trial procedure “is applicable only to pleas of not guilty before a jury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Womack, Keller, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb, Cochran, Johnson, Price, Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

144 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.