White v. Woodall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a state court does not unreasonably apply precedent by failing to extend it
• holding that Mitchell cannot be read to require a blanket no-adverse-inference instruction at every penalty- phase trial
• holding that Mitchell cannot be read to require a blanket no- adverse-inference instruction at every penalty-phase trial
• holding that a state court does not unreasonably apply precedent by failing to extend it
• holding that Mitchell cannot be read to require a blanket no- adverse-inference instruction at every penalty-phase trial
• holding that AEDPA “does not require state courts to extend [Supreme Court] precedent or license federal courts to treat the failure to do so as error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).