Supreme Court· 4/23/2014

White v. Woodall

Citations

134 S. Ct. 1697
188 L. Ed. 2d 698
2014 U.S. LEXIS 2935
82 U.S.L.W. 4288
572 U.S. 415
24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 695
2014 WL 1612424

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a state court does not unreasonably apply precedent by failing to extend it
holding that Mitchell cannot be read to require a blanket no-adverse-inference instruction at every penalty- phase trial
holding that Mitchell cannot be read to require a blanket no- adverse-inference instruction at every penalty-phase trial
holding that a state court does not unreasonably apply precedent by failing to extend it
holding that Mitchell cannot be read to require a blanket no- adverse-inference instruction at every penalty-phase trial
holding that AEDPA “does not require state courts to extend [Supreme Court] precedent or license federal courts to treat the failure to do so as error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scalia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

341 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named White v. Woodall

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.