Skip to main content
Sixth Circuit· 8/20/2010

Fields v. Howes

Citations

  • 617 F.3d 813
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17366
  • 2010 WL 3271654

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The central holding of Mathis is that a Miranda warning is required whenever an incarcerated individual is isolated from the general prison population and interrogated, i. e.[,] questioned in a manner likely to lead to self-incrimination, about conduct occurring outside of the prison”
  • “The central holding of Mathis is that a Miranda warning is required whenever an incarcerated individual is isolated from the general prison population and interro- gated, i.e.[,] questioned in a manner likely to lead to self- incrimination, about conduct occurring outside of the prison”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clay, McKeague, Polster

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.