Sixth Circuit· 8/20/2010
Fields v. Howes
Citations
- 617 F.3d 813
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17366
- 2010 WL 3271654
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The central holding of Mathis is that a Miranda warning is required whenever an incarcerated individual is isolated from the general prison population and interrogated, i. e.[,] questioned in a manner likely to lead to self-incrimination, about conduct occurring outside of the prison”
- “The central holding of Mathis is that a Miranda warning is required whenever an incarcerated individual is isolated from the general prison population and interro- gated, i.e.[,] questioned in a manner likely to lead to self- incrimination, about conduct occurring outside of the prison”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clay, McKeague, Polster
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Howes v. FieldsSupreme Court· 2012-02-21· cited 785×
- Campbell v. BradshawSixth Circuit· 2012-03-20· cited 67×
- People v. CortezMichigan Court of Appeals· 2013-03-12· cited 66×
- United States v. MelanconFifth Circuit· 2011-11-09· cited 12×
- Craig Wilson v. Burl Cain, WardenFifth Circuit· 2011-05-11· cited 11×
- Howes v. FieldsSupreme Court· 2011-01-24· cited 3×
- People v. CortezMichigan Court of Appeals· 2011-10-27· cited 2×
- Craig Wilson v. Burl Cain, WardenFifth Circuit· 2011-05-27
- Buster v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2013-08-29
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court· 2000-04-18· cited 15,929×
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-06-10· cited 7,845×
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 7,022×
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court· 2003-03-05· cited 4,077×
- Yarborough v. AlvaradoSupreme Court· 2004-06-01· cited 3,494×
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 2,603×
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 2,048×
- Renico v. LettSupreme Court· 2010-05-03· cited 1,940×
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court· 1995-11-29· cited 1,729×
- O'NEAL v. McAninchSupreme Court· 1995-02-21· cited 1,687×
- Illinois v. PerkinsSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 906×
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-05-06· cited 760×
- McDaniel v. BrownSupreme Court· 2010-01-11· cited 701×
- Maryland v. ShatzerSupreme Court· 2010-02-24· cited 624×
- Enrique Ortiz Cervantes v. Bill Walker, Superintendent, Banning Road CampNinth Circuit· 1979-01-26· cited 177×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.