Skip to main content
· 7/17/1975

State v. Schur

Citations

  • 538 P.2d 689
  • 217 Kan. 741
  • 1975 Kan. LEXIS 491

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[lit is our conclusion that if any exigency existed it was created by the acts of the officer”
  • no exigency where officer noticed marijuana cigarette through glass door of apartment before his presence was known to resident and could have obtained a warrant on the plain sight of the cigarette

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Owsley, Fromme

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.