Skip to main content

Howard v. State

Citations

  • 966 S.W.2d 821
  • 1998 Tex. App. LEXIS 2098
  • 1998 WL 161254

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting argument that the trial court was obligated to sua sponte conduct a hearing into potential conflict of interest where attorney represented two defendants
  • rejecting argument that the trial court was obligated to sua sponte conduct a hearing into potential conflict of interest where attorney represented two defendants
  • noting that weight of Texas authority precluded a holding that the district court was obligated under the Texas Constitution to sua sponte conduct a hearing into the possibility that trial counsel might experience a conflict of interest by representing both defendants at trial
  • noting that weight of Texas authority precluded a holding that the district court was obligated under the Texas Constitution to sua sponte conduct a hearing into the possibility that trial counsel might experience a conflict of interest by representing both defendants at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Powers, Aboussie and B.A. Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.