Skip to main content
· 2/6/1997

Oestrick v. State

Citations

  • 939 S.W.2d 232
  • 1997 Tex. App. LEXIS 530
  • 1997 WL 45566

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding appellant did not preserve complaint when he failed to either obtain a ruling on his request for a hearing or obtain an order overruling his motion for new trial
  • “Having failed to obtain a ruling on his request for a hearing—or at least a written order overruling his motion for new trial—and having failed to object to the lack of a ruling, appellant has not preserved this complaint for appellate review.”
  • “Having failed to obtain a ruling on his request for a hearing—or at least a written order overruling his motion for new trial—and having failed to object to the lack of a ruling, appellant has not preserved this complaint for appellate 14 review.”
  • additional reason for lack of entitlement to self-defense instruction was that no evidence that a reasonable person would not have retreated
  • additional reason for lack of entitlement to self-defense instruction was that no evidence that a reasonable person would not have retreated
  • such a tense and potentially volatile situation existed where victim was abandoned that it could hardly be said to be a \safe place\ as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Powers, Aboussie, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.