First Circuit· 6/22/2004

Hoult v. Hoult

Citations

373 F.3d 47
32 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2938
2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 12231
2004 WL 1380254

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that once benefits have been distributed to a beneficiary, a creditor’s rights are enforceable against that beneficiary
holding that court order requiring judgment debtor to disgorge pension benefits already received did not violate anti-alienation provision
holding that the anti-alienation provision under ERISA applies to pension funds \only while held by the plan administrator and not after they reach the hands of the beneficiary\
noting that appellant cannot raise argument for first time in reply brief
noting that appellant cannot raise argument for first time in reply brief
explaining that \the propriety of the original [preliminary injunction] order\ was \beyond the scope of our review\ of a motion to modify that injunction (quoting 16 Wright & Miller's Federal Practice & Procedure § 3924.2 (3d ed. 2025))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Lynch, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.