Ruben Carnero v. Boston Scientific Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the “IJ . . . did 4 not evaluate, or even meaningfully acknowledge” testimony and 5 evidence favorable to the petitioner, “and we must therefore 6 give the IJ [an] opportunity to do so”
• Title IX claims borrow the state statute of limitations; federal law 13 determines when the claim accrues
• the involvement of some U.S.-based personnel in the decision to take adverse employment action overseas does not give rise to a domestic application of SOX

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).