Skip to main content

Anthis v. Copland

Citations

  • 173 Wash. 2d 752
  • 270 P.3d 574

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Washington “[e]xemption statutes should be liberally construed to give effect to their intent and purpose.” (citations omitted)
  • exemption in RCW 41.26.053(1) for law enforcement officer and firefighter retirement system pension benefits does not continue once pension funds are deposited into personal account of the beneficiary
  • construction of statute is question of law reviewed de novo
  • construction of statute is question of law reviewed de novo
  • statute subject to two reasonable interpretations is ambiguous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alexander, Chambers, Fairhurst, Johnson, Madsen, Owens, Stephens, Wiggins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Anthis v. Copland

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.