Hornbostel v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that drunkenness should not to be considered as a mitigating circumstance
• holding when two versions of events are presented, the jury’s guilty verdict shows “the jury found that the State negated the presence of sudden heat beyond a reasonable doubt”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).