Indiana Supreme Court· 12/21/1999
Smith v. State
Citations
- 721 N.E.2d 213
- 1999 Ind. LEXIS 1185
- 1999 WL 1220015
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “[b]ecause [the witness]’s testimony was essential to the State’s case . . . we cannot conclude that this restriction on exploring [the witness]’s bias was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt”
- holding admissible statements by a police officer to a defendant where the statements regarding others’ opinions were intended to provoke a response, even without an admonishment to the jury regarding the purpose of the statements
- rejecting the State's argument that during an interrogation police questions and comments designed to elicit responses from the defendant constituted nonhearsay
- “[V]iolations of the right to cross- examine are subject to harmless-error analysis.”
- “[V]iolations of the right to cross-examine are subject to harmless-error analysis.”
- discussing the importance of cross-examination for demonstrating a witness’s bias
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boehm, Dickson, Sullivan, Rucker, Shepard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Daniel Lee Pierce v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2015-05-12· cited 143×
- Kubsch v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2003-03-14· cited 129×
- Wilkes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2009-12-10· cited 99×
- Washington v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2004-05-20· cited 95×
- Marcum v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-03-29· cited 90×
- McCarthy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-06-28· cited 72×
- West v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-09-24· cited 68×
- Wenzel Williams v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2015-10-26· cited 66×
- Alton Neville v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2012-10-19· cited 46×
- Tolliver v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2010-03-18· cited 33×
- Howard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2006-09-06· cited 30×
- Ortiz v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-02-01· cited 28×
- Collins v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-10-11· cited 26×
- Pitman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-05-03· cited 26×
- Nelson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-07-31· cited 26×
- Bostick v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-08-19· cited 25×
- Stewart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-08-29· cited 25×
- Fosha v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-05-23· cited 24×
- Lampkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-11-22· cited 20×
- Reginald Harris v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2017-06-22· cited 20×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
- Drollinger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1980-08-26· cited 122×
- Thompson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-12-23· cited 107×
- Willey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 85×
- Griffin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-10-01· cited 84×
- Strong v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-05-22· cited 59×
- Humphrey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-05-29· cited 53×
- Angleton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-10-09· cited 51×
- United States v. Vincent M. Portalla, A/K/A Vincent MarinoFirst Circuit· 1993-02-08· cited 45×
- Jarrett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1986-10-21· cited 39×
- Bufkin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-10-29· cited 31×
- Pigg v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1992-11-23· cited 27×
- Thornton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-06-09· cited 23×
- Becker v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1998-05-18· cited 22×
- Grund v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-08-07· cited 21×
- Pfefferkorn v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1980-12-30· cited 21×
- Levi v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1994-01-31· cited 15×
- McQuay v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1991-02-14· cited 15×
- Griffin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1998-02-10· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.