Skip to main content

Hoover v. State

Citations

  • 958 A.2d 816
  • 2008 Del. LEXIS 448
  • 2008 WL 4455551

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the same precept to an evaluation of a statute under the United States constitution
  • “If the language of the statute is unambiguous, the plain meaning of the words controls.”
  • “lf the language of the statute is unambiguous, the plain meaning of the words controls.”
  • “If the language of the statute is unambiguous, the plain meaning of the words control.”
  • “[T]his Court may refer to parts of the legislative record to establish the purpose of legislation where the record reveals more information about the enactments.”
  • “lf the language of the statute is unambiguous, the plain meaning of the words controls.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steele, Chief Justice, Holland, Berger, Jacobs, and Ridgely, Justices, Constituting the Court en Banc

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.