State v. Baker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the underlying premise of the rule is that no person shall be held criminally responsible for conduct that he could not reasonably understand to be prohibited
• holding similar statute impermissibly shifts burden of proof to defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Sheehan v. Oblates of St. Francis de Sales
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2011-02-22· cited 53×
• Commonwealth v. Duda
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-05-31· cited 44×
• Hoover v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2008-10-06· cited 41×
• Disabatino v. State
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2002-02-27· cited 16×
• Terex Corp. v. Southern Track & Pump, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2015-06-15· cited 15×
• Wien v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2005-07-22· cited 14×
• State v. Robbins
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-07-15· cited 14×
• State v. Poshka
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-04-01· cited 12×
• Stevens v. State of Delaware.
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2015-01-20· cited 12×
• Burrell v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2019-03-11· cited 9×
• State v. Pollman
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2008-11-21· cited 7×
• Bransfield v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2008-07-01
• State of Arizona v. Tyla Naureen Poshka
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-04-01
• Lamberty v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2015-01-30
• Terex Corporation
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2015-06-15
• Terex Corporation
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2015-06-16
• State of Delaware v. John M. Hannon
  Delaware Court of Common Pleas· 2016-01-19
• State v. Byrne
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2017-04-27
• State v. Byrne
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2017-05-08
• DNREC v. DSWA
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2020-01-29

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• In Re WINSHIP
  Supreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
• Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1982-03-03· cited 3,694×
• Kolender v. Lawson
  Supreme Court· 1983-05-02· cited 3,306×
• Connally v. General Construction Co.
  Supreme Court· 1926-01-04· cited 3,272×
• Patterson v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1977-06-17· cited 2,751×
• United States v. Harriss
  Supreme Court· 1954-06-07· cited 1,827×
• Smith v. Goguen
  Supreme Court· 1974-03-25· cited 1,514×
• People v. Patterson
  New York Court of Appeals· 1976-04-01· cited 442×
• Commonwealth v. Barud
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-07-30· cited 175×
• Chaffraix v. Shiff
  Supreme Court· 1875-10-15· cited 154×
• Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPA
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-12-15· cited 145×
• Justice Ex Rel. Justice v. Gatchell
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1974-08-13· cited 99×
• Fuenning v. Superior Court
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-12-15· cited 92×
• State v. Crediford
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-12-12· cited 72×
• Sanders v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1990-12-28· cited 65×
• Martin v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.
  Supreme Court· 1978-05-01· cited 60×
• Coxe v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1971-08-27· cited 45×
• In Re Kennedy
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1984-01-24· cited 39×
• Richardson v. Wile
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1988-01-04· cited 33×
• State v. Martin
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-12-10· cited 32×