Skip to main content
· 3/16/1989

Spielberg v. State

Citations

  • 558 A.2d 291
  • 1989 Del. LEXIS 100

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that if the intent of the legislature is clearly reflected in the statute the text of the statute controls
  • holding that “[i]n the construction of a statute … the statute must be viewed as a whole, and literal or perceived interpretations which yield mischievous or absurd results are to be avoided …”
  • stating that, statutes “must be viewed as a whole”
  • stating that, statutes “must be viewed as a whole”
  • stating that statutes “must be viewed as a whole”
  • stating that, statutes “must be viewed as a whole”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Horsey, Walsh, Holland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.