Ingram v. Thorpe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Where the language of the statute is unambiguous, no interpretation is required and the plain meaning of the words controls.” (citing Spielberg, 558 A.2d at 291)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).