Skip to main content

Evans v. State

Citations

  • 212 A.3d 308

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting Delaware “[c]ourt[s] appl[y] settled principles of statutory interpretation, giving effect to the plain language of an unambiguous statute, and applying the literal meaning of the statute’s words.” (citing Arnold v. State, 49 A.3d 1180, 1183 (Del. 2012)
  • Court is not free to interpret or add to statutes to obtain what a party claims “would be a more ‘workable’ result or sound public policy.”
  • Court is not free to interpret or add to statutes to obtain what a party claims “would be a more ‘workable’ result or sound public policy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallace J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.