State v. Moulden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[O]ur legal system necessarily proceeds upon the assumption that jurors will follow the trial judge’s instruction.”
• “Ineonsistent jury verdicts, although perhaps illogical, do occur and are valid.”
• “Although a stet permits an accused to be proceeded against at a later date under the same charging document, a nolle prosequi does not. The nol pros of a charging document or of a count is ‘a final disposition’ of the charging document or count[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).