Sonny Ray Byrne v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding section 22.011(a)(2)(A) did not violate appellant’s state or federal constitutional rights
• rejecting appellant’s argument that the absence of a mens rea requirement in section 22.011(a)(2)(A) renders the statute unconstitutional
• ―As long as the bonds are unregistered, strict liability is imposed regardless of how many securities are involved.‖

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).