McNeal v. State
Citations
- 76 Fla. 200
- 79 So. 728
Syllabus
<p>1. Testimony of the contents of letters from a disinterested person to a witness testifying in the trial of a defendant upon a criminal charge is heresay and inadmissable.</p> <p>2. Where there is substantial competent evidence in the record of all the facts legally essential to support the verdict, and there is nothing to indicate that the Jury were not governed by the evidence, the refusal of the Trial Court to grant a new trial, on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, will not be disturbed by the Appellate Court.</p>
Judges: Browne, Emm, Taylor, West, Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Herndon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1917-02-24· cited 29×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1913-07-08· cited 19×
- Barrentine v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1916-06-13· cited 19×
- McClellan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1913-10-28· cited 16×
- Messer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1918-04-25· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.