Hamlin v. State
Citations
- 80 Fla. 217
- 85 So. 685
Syllabus
<p>1. Although there may be conflicts in the evidence, if there is sufficient competent evidence of all the facts legally essential to support a verdict of conviction and there is nothing in the record to indicate that the jury was influenced by any consideration outside the evidence in arriving at the verdict returned, the judgment will not be disturbed by an appellate court on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict.</p> <p>2. Evidence examined and found sufficient to support a verdict of conviction.</p>
Judges: Browne, Ellis, Iitfield, Taylor, West
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kirkland v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1921-07-13· cited 15×
- Studstill v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1922-05-19· cited 9×
- Collinsworth v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1921-10-19· cited 7×
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1922-02-18· cited 7×
- Crawford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1923-06-20· cited 5×
- Carr v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1922-08-01· cited 3×
- Daniels v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1921-11-23· cited 2×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Herndon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1917-02-24· cited 29×
- McCoy v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1918-02-20· cited 26×
- Barrentine v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1916-06-13· cited 19×
- Wallace v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1918-08-05· cited 17×
- McClellan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1913-10-28· cited 16×
- Messer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1918-04-25· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.