Seventh Circuit· 2/26/2016

Hernandez v. Dart

Citations

814 F.3d 836
2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 3426
2016 WL 761037

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the pretrial detainee plaintiff exhausted his administrative remedies as he was required to do under the PLRA
holding that prisoner at Cook County Department of Corrections must file a grievance and appeal after receipt of any administrative response to the grievance to exhaust his administrative remedies
noting that this court had jurisdiction over appeal given “multiple indicia that the district court was finished with the case”
stating that unavailability “extends beyond ‘affirmative misconduct’ to omissions by prison personnel, particularly failing to inform the prisoner of the grievance process”
finding that the jail grievance process was unavailable to an inmate who was hospitalized after excessive force and had no information about how to file a grievance
noting that because officials rendered grievance process unavailable to detainee, district court did not need to consider whether detainee raised valid grievance about the conditions of his detention

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Hamilton, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Hernandez v. Dart

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.