Pavey v. Conley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, where exhaustion is contested, the court must first determine whether the plaintiff exhausted his administrative remedies before addressing the merits of the case
• holding that, where exhaustion is contested, the court must first determine whether the plaintiff exhausted his administrative remedies before addressing the merits of the case
• concluding that a case should not proceed to pretrial discovery until the PLRA exhaustion is resolved by the district court judge
• holding that, where exhaustion is contested, the court must first determine whether the plaintiff exhausted his administrative remedies before addressing the merits of the case
• holding that disputed factual questions on exhaustion must be resolved by the district court judge after conducting a hearing
• holding that prisoner not entitled to a jury trial on contested issues regarding his failure to exhaust; instead, a hearing before the district court suffices to resolve any such questions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).