Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Seventh Circuit· 11/26/2019

Rex Frederickson v. Tizoc Landeros

Citations

  • 943 F.3d 1054

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the PLRA requires that prisoners “exhaust intra-prison administrative remedies”
  • considering qualified immunity and framing the is- sue as whether a police officer “violated [the Plaintiff’s] fed- eral rights, not whether [the officer] was misinterpreting a state law”
  • considering qualified immunity and framing the is- sue as whether a police officer “violated [the Plaintiff’s] fed- eral rights, not whether [the officer] was misinterpreting a state law”
  • “if the plaintiff and a comparator share the relevant characteristic, then differential treatment may suggest an impermissible motive”
  • “[S]ome things are established. . . . Olech . . . defines the inquiry we must conduct[.]”
  • the presence of animus is powerful evidence of potentially irrational government conduct, government conduct motivated solely by personal dislike is the canonical example of irrational and arbitrary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Rex Frederickson v. Tizoc Landeros

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.