Skip to main content
· 8/16/2006

Karamo B. Kaba v. E.A. Stepp, Mickal E. Laird, Dave Benson, and Joseph Yonkman

Citations

  • 458 F.3d 678
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 20923
  • 2006 WL 2358002

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that failure to train and supervise is a state law claim that implicates the FTCA
  • holding that “[a] Bivens action may not be brought against the United States or a federal agency”
  • holding that “[a] Bivens action may not be brought against the United States or a federal agency”
  • holding that “[a] Bivens action may not be brought against the United States or a federal agency”
  • holding that “[a] Bivens action may not be brought against . . . a federal agency”
  • holding that administrative remedies were not available where the prison official warned the prisoner not to file a grievance and successfully pressured other inmates to assault the prisoner in order to prevent the prisoner from pursuing the grievance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Royner, Wood, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.