D. Delaware· 5/26/1977
Hercules Inc. v. Exxon Corp.
Citations
- 434 F. Supp. 136
- 24 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1343
- 196 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 401
- 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15700
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “If the primary purpose of a communication is to solicit or render advice on non-legal matters, the communication is not within the scope of the attorney-client privilege.”
- first finding that defendant did not demonstrate substantial need or undue hardship to vitiate the immunity, then considering whether defendant showed a prima facie case of fraud to invoke the crime-fraud exception to vitiate the privilege
- plaintiff required to respond “to the best of its ability”
- an incidental request for business advice “does not vitiate the attorney-client privilege.”
- attorney merely a conduit for such information to PTO
- plaintiff who sued on Sea Waybill bound by its terms
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Caleb M. Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
134 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Federal Trade Commission v. Grolier Inc.Supreme Court· 1983-06-06· cited 387×
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Appeal of Fmc Corporation, Douglas E. Kliever and Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & HamiltonThird Circuit· 1979-07-18· cited 271×
- In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of United States of AmericaThird Circuit· 1979-06-01· cited 261×
- National Tank Co. v. BrothertonTexas Supreme Court· 1993-04-07· cited 139×
- American Standard Inc. v. Pfizer Inc. And Howmedica, Inc., and Biomet, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1987-08-31· cited 131×
- Tackett v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1995-02-10· cited 115×
- Nestle Foods Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.D. New Jersey· 1990-11-13· cited 99×
- Hodges v. Southern Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1983-05-23· cited 97×
- James Julian, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.D. Delaware· 1982-01-20· cited 93×
- Roesberg v. Johns-Manville Corp.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1980-01-24· cited 89×
- Zirn v. VLI Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1993-03-08· cited 78×
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District of Columbia· 1979-04-18· cited 74×
- Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago v. CatonD. Kansas· 1991-05-22· cited 74×
- Ohio-Sealy Mattress Manufacturing Co. v. KaplanN.D. Illinois· 1980-09-17· cited 69×
- In re Sunrise Securities LitigationE.D. Pennsylvania· 1989-05-31· cited 63×
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Dated Dec. 18, 1981, Etc.E.D. New York· 1982-08-20· cited 61×
- Leonen v. Johns-ManvilleD. New Jersey· 1990-07-18· cited 60×
- In Re Vioxx Products Liability LitigationE.D. Louisiana· 2007-09-04· cited 59×
- Andritz Sprout-Bauer, Inc. v. Beazer East, Inc.M.D. Pennsylvania· 1997-07-28· cited 59×
- Detection Systems, Inc. v. Pittway Corp.W.D. New York· 1982-11-08· cited 58×
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court· 1947-01-13· cited 4,981×
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1933-03-13· cited 738×
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationD. Massachusetts· 1950-03-10· cited 503×
- Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida BarSupreme Court· 1963-05-27· cited 362×
- Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.D. South Carolina· 1974-12-19· cited 231×
- Republic Gear Company v. Borg-Warner CorporationSecond Circuit· 1967-06-30· cited 170×
- Radiant Burners, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. American Gas Association, Peoples Gas Light and Coke CompanySeventh Circuit· 1963-06-28· cited 158×
- Burlington Industries v. Exxon Corp.D. Maryland· 1974-10-21· cited 127×
- Natta v. HoganTenth Circuit· 1968-03-21· cited 126×
- The Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 1976-07-13· cited 117×
- City of Philadelphia v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1962-10-19· cited 94×
- The Duplan Corporation v. Moulinage Et Retorderie De Chavanoz, Deering Milliken, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 1973-10-23· cited 88×
- Stix Products, Inc. v. United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc.S.D. New York· 1969-05-12· cited 70×
- Xerox Corp. v. International Business Machines Corp.S.D. New York· 1974-07-23· cited 70×
- International Paper Co. v. Fibreboard Corp.D. Delaware· 1974-04-30· cited 63×
- Underwater Storage, Inc. v. United States Rubber Co.District of Columbia· 1970-03-17· cited 62×
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaD. Delaware· 1954-05-20· cited 62×
- Giulio Natta, Piero Pino and Georgio Mazzanti, Ex Rel. Interference 89,634 v. Alex Zletz and Standard Oil Company of IndianaSeventh Circuit· 1969-11-19· cited 50×
- Jack Winter, Inc. v. Koratron Co.N.D. California· 1971-11-22· cited 50×
- Georgia-Pacific Plywood Co. v. United States Plywood Corp.S.D. New York· 1956-02-16· cited 44×
Other cases named Hercules Inc. v. Exxon Corp.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.