In Re Vioxx Products Liability Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• using Lone Pine order after case had been pending for three years and “much discovery ha[d] taken place”
• requiring plaintiffs to make a minimal showing consistent with Rule 26 that there is some kind of scientific basis that Vioxx could cause the alleged injury
• requiring plaintiffs to make a minimal showing consistent with Rule 26 that there is some kind of scientific basis that Vioxx could cause the alleged injury
• where case had been ongoing for ten years with discovery of millions of pages of documents, hundreds of depositions, and approximately one thousand pretrial motions, \it is not too much to ask a Plaintiff to provide some kind of evidence to support [his or her] claim\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).