N.D. California· 3/7/2008
Herbert J. Sims & Co., Inc. v. Roven
Citations
- 548 F. Supp. 2d 759
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52300
- 2008 WL 686591
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding a plaintiff would suffer irreparable harm if forced to arbitrate a dispute not subject to arbitration because it would have “no adequate remedy at law to recover the monetary and human capital it would expend defending itself in arbitration”
- finding a plaintiff would suffer irreparable harm if forced to arbitrate a dispute not subject to arbitration because it would have “no adequate remedy at law to 3 General Mills, Inc. v. Chobani, LLC, 158 F.Supp.3d 106, 115 (N.D.N.Y. 2016
- A FINRA arbitrations are governed by the NASD Code of Arbitration Procedure. @
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Martin J. Jenkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re H&R Block Financial Advisors, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2008-08-28· cited 86×
- J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. v. Louisiana Citizens Property InsuranceS.D. New York· 2010-05-03· cited 26×
- Morgan Stanley & Co. v. CouchE.D. California· 2015-09-24· cited 19×
- Berthel Fisher & Co. Financial Services v. LarmonEighth Circuit· 2012-10-01· cited 10×
- MONAVIE, LLC v. Quixtar Inc.D. Utah· 2009-10-26· cited 7×
- Morgan Keegan & Co. v. McPolandW.D. Washington· 2011-12-06· cited 5×
- Grant v. RotolanteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-08-29· cited 3×
- JP Morgan SEC. v. LOUISIANA CITIZENS PROP. INS.S.D. New York· 2010-05-03· cited 2×
- Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. v. MitchellNinth Circuit· 2025-04-24· cited 2×
- Bokf v. EstesD. Nevada· 2018-03-02
- Waveland Capital Partners, LLC v. TommerupD. Montana· 2012-01-06
- Hulstrunk v. Ultracell Insulation, LLCVermont Superior Court· 2018-09-18
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 4,474×
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court· 1989-03-06· cited 2,861×
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court· 1981-04-29· cited 2,376×
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court· 2002-12-10· cited 1,948×
- Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc., a California Corporation, D/B/A Sisco v. John D. Brush and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationNinth Circuit· 2001-02-13· cited 1,124×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,720 Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. v. Ferdinand A. Neidhardt, and Erich Hoepfer, Stephen Rothchild DesimoneSecond Circuit· 1995-05-11· cited 201×
- Connecticut General Life Insurance Company v. New Images Of Beverly HillsNinth Circuit· 2003-03-03· cited 130×
- Textile Unlimited, Inc., a California Corporation v. A..bmhand Company, Inc., a Georgia CorporationNinth Circuit· 2001-02-14· cited 123×
- Maryland Casualty Company v. Realty Advisory Board on Labor Relations, Gus Bevona, President, Local 32b-32j, Service Employees International UnionSecond Circuit· 1997-01-31· cited 116×
- West Point-Pepperell, Inc. v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, U. S. Department of LaborEleventh Circuit· 1982-10-21· cited 70×
- LGS Architects, Inc. v. Concordia Homes of NevadaNinth Circuit· 2006-01-11· cited 38×
- Roe v. AndersonNinth Circuit· 1998-01-28· cited 35×
- Fleet Boston Robertson Stephens, Inc. v. Innovex, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 2001-08-30· cited 21×
- BMA Financial Services, Inc. v. GuinW.D. Louisiana· 2001-09-27· cited 12×
- John Hancock Life Insurance v. WilsonSecond Circuit· 2001-06-18· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.