Textile Unlimited, Inc., a California Corporation v. A..bmhand Company, Inc., a Georgia Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing district court to compel arbitration in its district even though the arbitration agreement specified a forum outside the district
• confirming preliminary injunction 3 based on district court’s finding that plaintiff would suffer irreparable harm if arbitration 4 were not stayed
• “[Section 4] does not require that the petition be filed where the contract specified that arbitration should occur.”
• \[W]e conclude that the Federal Arbitration Act does not require venue in the contractually-designated arbitration locale.\
• “Textile only participated in the arbitration to contest the arbitration itself. In so doing, Textile did not waive its objection to the arbitration.”
• “The Court presumably has authority to issue an injunction staying arbitration ... under its traditional equitable powers.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).