Skip to main content
· 2/13/2001

Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc., a California Corporation, D/B/A Sisco v. John D. Brush and Company, Inc., a New York Corporation

Citations

  • 240 F.3d 832
  • 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1304
  • 57 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1920
  • 2001 Daily Journal DAR 1643
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 2083
  • 2000 WL 33159155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the “threatened loss of prospective customers or goodwill certainly supports a finding of the possibility of irreparable harm.”
  • explaining 12 that the showings required to support a TRO are “substantially identical” to the showings required 13 for a preliminary injunction
  • noting 9 the analysis for a TRO and a preliminary injunction are substantially identical
  • “Evidence of threatened loss of prospective customers or goodwill certainly supports a finding of the possibility of irreparable harm.”
  • evidence of 5 threatened loss of prospective customers or goodwill supports an irreparable harm finding
  • evidence of 6 threatened loss of prospective customers or goodwill supports an irreparable harm finding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hug, McKEOWN, Paez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.