· 2/13/2001
Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc., a California Corporation, D/B/A Sisco v. John D. Brush and Company, Inc., a New York Corporation
Citations
- 240 F.3d 832
- 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1304
- 57 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1920
- 2001 Daily Journal DAR 1643
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 2083
- 2000 WL 33159155
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the “threatened loss of prospective customers or goodwill certainly supports a finding of the possibility of irreparable harm.”
- explaining 12 that the showings required to support a TRO are “substantially identical” to the showings required 13 for a preliminary injunction
- noting 9 the analysis for a TRO and a preliminary injunction are substantially identical
- “Evidence of threatened loss of prospective customers or goodwill certainly supports a finding of the possibility of irreparable harm.”
- evidence of 5 threatened loss of prospective customers or goodwill supports an irreparable harm finding
- evidence of 6 threatened loss of prospective customers or goodwill supports an irreparable harm finding
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hug, McKEOWN, Paez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.