Hendricks v. DSW Shoe Warehouse Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing a case where no Michigan authority supported an action for credit monitoring and where Michigan had considered and rejected a cause of action for medical monitoring
• interpreting the Michigan Consumer Protection Act and concluding that Michigan courts would not recognize a claim under the act for an omission “in the absence of a duty of disclosure”
• “There is no existing Michigan statutory or case law authority to support plaintiffs position that the purchase of credit monitoring constitutes actual damages or a cognizable loss.”
• “In addition, a breach of contract claim must be rejected where the breach, if any, is ‘damnum absque injuria.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).