M&D, INC v. McCONKEY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that summary disposition on a claim of silent fraud was appropriate because the plaintiff did not show that the defendant had any 5 Plaintiff argues that such a duty was established by Mich Admin Code, R 339.22333(1
• stating that silent fraud is only actionable if it occurred when there was a duty to disclose
• stating that an equitable duty to disclose can arise when buyers of real estate “express particularized concern or directly inquire of the seller”
• noting that highly misleading actions give rise to a duty to disclose product defects
• finding that the plaintiff failed to establish a legal duty pursuant to a sales contract when the contract expressly disclaimed representations and warranties and stated that the property was being sold “as is.”
• listing elements of common-law fraud as (1) the defendant made a material misrepresentation; (2) the representation was false; (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).