Skip to main content
· 10/20/2011

Anderson v. Hannaford Bros. Co.

Citations

  • 659 F.3d 151
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 21239
  • 2011 WL 5007175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing the availability, in Maine, of recovery for economic losses in the form of “mitigation damages,” i.e., recovery for costs and harms incurred during a reasonable effort to mitigate losses occasioned by computer data breaches
  • “A jury could reasonably conclude, therefore, that an implicit agreement to safeguard the data is necessary to effectuate the contract.”
  • “[T]his case does not involve inadvertently misplaced or lost data accessed or misused by third parties. Here, there was actual misuse, and it was apparently global in reach.”
  • electronic payment processing system of national grocery chain was breached by hackers who stole up to 4.2 million credit and debit card numbers, expiration dates, and security codes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lynch, Torruella, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.